Protecting Horses

 

 

 

In this section, you'll find information and comment about efforts to protect horses from diseases that ravage them to all forms of abuse, including cruel training practices, and the ongoing practice of killing horses for their meat.

February 7, 2010

Tennessee Walking Horse Celebration

The Walking Horse Celebration has an interesting, inviting web site. We learn that the annual Celebration lasts eleven days and ends on Saturday night before Labor Day; that close to a quarter of a million tickets are sold; that more than $650,000 in awards and prizes are distributed every year; and that the event was started in 1939 by Henry Davis and has been held every year since without interruption. The Celebration is held in the small town of Shelbyville, Tennessee (population 16,105). To Walking Horse aficionados, the Celebration is the most eagerly anticipated horse event each year, and people come from forty states to participate. It's easy to imagine the great pride of this small community in its prestigious event--and the economic rewards the town looks forward to. All the ingredients seem to be there for a wonderful eleven days for everyone. All except the horses that have been sored, of course.

The then-president of the American Humane Association posted a blog to the AHA website, reprinted in the TWH website, after she spent the Labor Day weekend in Shelbyville, her home town. While Marie Belew Wheatley praises the Tennessee Walking Horse for its beautiful gait, she does talk about soring. Here is what she said. Note her mention of the 2006 Celebration:

"Although soring is illegal, some trainers and owners unfortunately still employ these techniques in order to win at any cost. However, after the Shelbyville Celebration was not able to award a World Grand Champion in 2006 because eight of the 11 finalists failed inspection due to evidence of soring, something had to be done.

Since then, the Walking Horse industry has been making a concerted effort to improve training techniques and standards, and it has included American Humane in this ongoing process. I was invited to be part of a working committee comprised of equine veterinarians, veterinary academics and horse industry leaders to develop a plan to end soring, and I spent an entire day during my recent visit meeting with this committee to find solutions.

This year, a new inspection structure, more consistent inspections and more serious penalties were implemented at the Celebration -- and quite a few competitors were disqualified as a result. In addition, three people recently received lifetime suspensions from the sport as a result of violations at a July horse show -- the strongest penalties ever given in the Walking Horse industry and a bold move that demonstrates the industry’s commitment to ending the practice of soring.

I applaud the industry’s efforts to continually improve, and I hope that in the not-too-distant future, these inhumane techniques will be a thing of the past. As I attended the last three nights of the Celebration, that hope was reinforced by something very special that I witnessed. About 15 young horses were being led around the ring during the Weanlings Class competition. As I watched these adorable, frisky young horses displaying their natural, unspoiled gait, I thought, “If these little guys are trained with good, humane techniques and can grow up without pain or scars and compete with others just like them, that will be a great thing.” It occurred to me that, thanks to all of those interested in the welfare of these wonderful animals, I was seeing the bright, new future of Tennessee Walking Horses."

Read the Celebration web site: http://www.twhnc.com/news_views.htm.

The Humane Society's web article, "The Cruelest Horse Show on Earth," pulls no punches about the 2009 Celebration, saying that contrary to the horse industry claim that soring is defeated, the number of violations has been on the rise. (See http://www.humanesociety.org/news/news/2009/09/cruelest_horse_show_091709.html.) Larry Taft of The Tennessean wrote an excellent account of the 2009 Celebration entitled "Tennessee Walking Horse Abuse Triples in 4 Months." The article is as frank as the Humane Society's. He reminds us about the Horse Protection Act and says that for 30 years a group made up of owners and trainers oversaw compliance with the law in the Walking Horse industry. But that group fought with the USDA (US Department of Agriculture) over matters of interpreting and enforcing the law. This group dissolved in March 2009. Then the Celebration took it upon itself to make sure the law against soring was followed. After much discussion and meetings with relevant groups, officials finally came up with the  plan of two veterinarians enforcing 30 stewards, who would do the inspections necessary to discover which horses were sored. Inspections were supposed to be at as many gaited horse shows as possible. In a Woodbury horse show, for example, inspectors found a device in a horse's mouth to distract him from reacting to the stewards checking his sore feet. Three men were cited for taking one horse to an inspection before a show and swapping another horse in the post-show checkup. And Doyle Meadows, the CEO of the Celebration, removed 9 stewards he thought were not rigorous enough in their examinations. (See http://www.kentuckyhorse.org/en/art/285/.) The Humane Society adds in "The Cruelest Horse Show on Earth" that the trainers of "all three of the horses who took home the top awards" were cited for violating the scar rule. One owner was suspended for alleged bribery of an inspector. Certain training barns got many tickets. Inspectors found more than 400 violations. The "usual suspects," people who got citations in previous years or even during the 2009 show, kept participating and even winning.  But the Humane Society mentions lapses in the inspectors' performances: they did not watch well enough for stewarding; did not seem to be looking at all the horses who placed from first to third; and failed to put drug screening in place.

To give credit to the USDA: in light of some trainers trying to evade detection of soring by using masking or numbing agents on horses' legs, inspectors used gas chromatography and mass spectrometry for chemical analysis; infrared thermography for heat detection in the legs; and digital radiography. But, the Humane Society adds grimly, the USDA funding is far too little, only enough to send the inspectors to 7 percent of Tennessee Walking Horse shows throughout the nation.

January 30, 2010

The Horse Protection Act and Soring

The Horse Protection Act was passed with great hopes that the barbaric practice of soring could be stopped. However, that did not happen.

First, some background. Unscrupulous owners and trainers in the 1950s who were dissatisfied with the results of normal training methods started to sore their horses. By the next decade, soring was widespread in the horse industry. But there were many honest, reputable people who hated the practice, and in response, in 1970, Congress passed the Horse Protection Act, and amended it in 1976. The law is two-pronged: horses should not be subjected to soring, and responsible owners and trainers should not have to suffer from unfair competition with those who sore their horses. The Act is enforced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS.) Sored horses cannot be part of auctions, sales, shows or exhibitions. It is also a crime to transport sored horses to or from any of the aforementioned events. Those who violate the Act are liable to civil or criminal charges. Civil violations can result in disqualification of one or more years and additionally, "up to $2200 or more per violation." (People who are disqualified may only be spectators at horse shows but are barred from participating in any other way.) If convicted of a criminal complaint, violators can go to prison for "up to 2 years" and pay penalties of up to $5000. http://www.usda.gov

August 4, 2009

The slaughter of horses in the United States for their meat was dealt a severe blow when a federal court ruling in 2007 closed the last horse-processing plant. (Mexico and Canada, however,  have taken up the slack by allowing slaughter houses in their countries.) However, this horrendous crime of killing horses for their meat is still going on, as seen in the butchering of at least 17 horses in Florida. January 11 was the first case in 2009 the local police say they got this year, although Allen Owens' horse Comanche was killed in his stall two years ago. No one has been caught for any of these crimes because the police say that the killings are done in rural areas where apparently there are no eyewitnesses. Police say as well that no citizens want to come forward and tell what they suspect or know. Unfortunately, this is true of human nature: whenever something terrible happens, many people, as much as they abhor what has been done, take the easy way out and cover their heads, refusing to make the telephone call that might keep the crime from happening again. Without information in these horse killings, the police can't do their job, and the killers will go right on selling their tainted horse meat to venal customers. Meanwhile, horse owners are terrified that they will find their animals dead in their stalls or in the woods or near a road or not find them at all. Perhaps a partial answer to the problem lies in the way a little tightly-knit community polices itself near where I live. If you live there, it is expected that you watch your neighbors' farms as well as your own, and alert everyone, including the police, when danger is suspected. Everyone keeps in touch with everyone else, whether it is by texting or e-mailing or telephoning when something is wrong, just doesn't look right.